Analysis: This is the best map of the 2020 election you’ll see #Breaking112
Which means that Trump’s favorite map shows that if land voted, he would have won a massive, sweeping victory in 2016. Which he didn’t. Because people vote. (Trump lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes to Clinton, but won the Electoral College.)
All of which brings me to the 2020 election. And the single best map to understand what happened and where the votes came from to deliver a victory to President-elect Joe Biden.
“This map looks similar to some other election maps out there, but it’s a little unusual. It tries to address something that I find frustrating about election maps: Very few of them do a good job of showing where voters are. (Brief thread, because I am enthusiastic about maps!)
“People often focus on the idea that election maps over-emphasize sparse rural areas with few people, but a deeper problem is that the maps imply that ‘areas’ have political leanings at all. Spots on the map belong to many overlapping areas won by different sides.
“You can be a Biden voter in a Trump household in a Biden precinct in a Trump county in a Biden district in a Trump state in a Biden country. Then what color is your land? Dirt-colored, I guess! Not only does land not vote, it doesn’t even have a preference.”
I like Munroe’s map so much because it gets us away from the traditional red-blue dynamic, painting counties and even states with very broad brushes. It shows there are plenty of Democrats in some parts of Alabama and lots of Republicans even in Southern California. We aren’t just colors on a map. The politics of the country are far more complex (and interesting!) than that.
“There are more Trump voters in California than Texas, more Biden voters in Texas than NY, more Trump voters in NY than Ohio, more Biden voters in Ohio than Massachusetts, more Trump voters in Massachusetts than Mississippi, and more Biden voters in Mississippi than Vermont.”